Monday, 23 April 2012

Shakespeare day



 Today was St Georges day, the national day of England. It was also supposedly the birthday and deathday of William Shakespeare.
 I must admit, I am sceptical of this idea. It just sounds too neat. Englands national poet born and died on its national day. As with much of Shakespeares life, there is sufficient uncertainty as to allow speculation. Whilst we know when he died, when he was born is uncertain. All we know for definite is that he was baptized on April 26th, which his local church documented. At the time, convention dictated that a child was baptized on the first Sunday or holy day following birth as it was believed that if not and if the infant died then they were going straight to hell. So, the error bars for his birth-date could be as high as a week before. If he had been born April 23rd 1564, a Sunday, then this presents a problem. St Marks day was April 25th. However, some people thought this to be unlucky, so maybe they delayed until April 26th.
 Believe it or not, to have this amount of data is quite lucky. Stratford had only started to keep records from 1558, even though they had been ordered to in 1538 (it was viewed with suspicion as a way to increase tax collection). Unfortunately, this wasn't in time for Anne Hathaway, who was older by eight years, so no record of her birth exists.
 Shakespeares life is 5% fact and 95% speculation, and surprisingly many speculative ideas have been worked into the publics knowledge of the man. I am going to write a series of articles about this and about Elizabethan England, because it's quite instructive on the limits of how much we can know history.

Thursday, 19 January 2012

George square statues


I've walked past the statues in George square hundreds of times, and I was vaguely aware of a couple of the historical characters they're based on, but to be honest I didn't really give them much thought - they were just background to wherever I was going (possibly a pub). However, apart from the Cenotaph, the Robert Burns and James Watt Statues, I didn't really know the rest, so it was a bit of a surprise to find out that they read a bit like history's who's whom:

Sir Walter Scott
Queen Victoria and Prince Albert
Sir Robert Peel
William Gladstone
Thomas Graham (Chemist at Glasgow uni)
Thomas Campbell (poet)
Field Marshall Lord Clyde (Soldier, obviously)
Sir John Moore
James Oswald (MP from 1832)

I know that most British cities have these tableau of famous historical people, but I do find them fascinating; these are records of what the people of a city found important at one time. They wanted the present and the future to know that they respected these people, it wasn't so much the image of the person being celebrated, it was also the image (usually Victorians) wanted to present of what the implied values were of celebrating such people, because these things cost money and valuable space so political consensus would be needed. The statues are a combination of politics, fighting, poetry, and science. Just like the Victorian era, really.